Lack of time can be the cause of poor performance

October 14, 2026
Lack of time can be the cause of poor performance

Having time to carry out and complete tasks is an important hygiene factor at work. By hygiene factor, we mean that the presence of the factor will not directly lead to satisfaction, but its absence will lead to dissatisfaction. In other words, if your employees report that they don't have enough time to complete their tasks, this can affect the overall picture of well-being and have an impact on several important motivational factors.

In Norwegian working life, time pressure is something many people recognise. Having a lot to do has become a kind of status symbol; after all, we like to feel important! At the same time, there are also increased expectations of both output and quality. We are supposed to do the same job we have always done, but faster and better.

Time pressure can be explained both objectively and subjectively.

The objective form of time pressure is the one we can measure – for example in the form of overtime, or tasks being cut back because of a lack of time (Trygstad, 2003). The subjective form is the employee's own experience that there isn't enough time. Here there will be individual differences. Some will experience time pressure as a stress factor, while others will be happy with the rush. Some will associate time pressure with money and enjoyment, while others will associate it with negative feelings and stress. By extension, a high level of stress over time can lead to burnout.

Richardsen & Martinussen (2008) explain that “burnout can be seen as the result of a job that was initially interesting, meaningful and challenging becoming unsatisfying and meaningless through an impossible work situation. Energy turns into exhaustion, engagement into cynicism, and perceived mastery into a feeling of ineffectiveness”. People who are on their way to burning out will also often try to reverse this development by spending more time at work and taking on more tasks (Matthiesen & Roness, 2002).

We have different abilities, and it is the experience of time pressure that is decisive.

We can also make employees who experience high pressure robust enough to handle it. The solution doesn't have to be to cut tasks or increase the time, which is often the most intuitive solution. The solution can be to increase the supply of resources so that tasks feel more manageable – and in many cases more motivating!

Resources can be anything from the equipment required, money or material things, to a sparring partner or support from a manager/colleagues.

Social support in the workplace

Social support in the workplace has proven to be particularly important, and can both have a positive impact on employees' working day and act as a good buffer in stressful situations. Even with many challenging tasks, employees will experience mastery when the right resources are available. Plenty of resources, even in a busy everyday life, can therefore increase employees' motivation and engagement.

Take the time perspective seriously and don't leave it out of the employee appraisal – perhaps this is exactly what is causing the lack of motivation and mastery.

Author: Malin Elisabet Lilletvedt, Organisational Adviser at Motivati.

Sources:

  • Trygstad, S. M. S. o. B. J. (2003). Bedre arbeidsmiljø i hjemmetjenesten? Evaluering av Arbeidstilsynets landsomfattende kampanje «Rett hjem» [A better working environment in home care services? Evaluation of the Labour Inspection Authority's nationwide campaign “Rett hjem”]. Nordlandsforskning no. 23/2003.
  • Richardsen, A. M., & Martinussen, M. (2008). Hva skal til for å øke arbeidsglede og motivasjon? En undersøkelse av jobbengasjement i helse- og omsorgsyrker [What does it take to increase job satisfaction and motivation? A study of work engagement in health and care professions]. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 45(3), 249-257.
  • Matthiesen, S. B., & Roness, A. (2002). Utbrent: krevende jobber – gode liv [Burnt out: demanding jobs – good lives]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology.